最後まで長文お読み頂き有難う御座いました。 また 来年の慰霊祭に向けて 勉強したいと思います。 The flow of the world abolition of nuclear weapons advanced since President オバマ did Prague declaration, and hope has been laid for world nuclear weapon extinction last year.
The human and a nuclear weapon of 80,000 which let several times creatures of the face of the Earth become extinct were deployed after the war to the nuclear weapon soon only in American Soviet Union U.K. France China and 5 countries. I greeted the end of the cold war period based on the deterrent of the nucleus, and the reduction effort of the nuclear weapon began, but it prescribed nuclear disarmament duty as a globally approved possession of nuclear weapons country and prohibited the possession of nuclear weapons of other fault possession of nuclear weapons countries and limited only the United States of America Soviet Union U.K. France People's Republic of China (five components country) to the peace use of the nucleus by the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) in 1968.
However, North Korea already withdraws from whether the current Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) member nation will become around 200 countries in the world, and India Israel Pakistan does not join it. Because point in time when this had a treaty namely Great War victory country 5 countries by the World War had already maintained a nuclear weapon, only these 5 countries recognized nucleus possession, but the use of the peace of the nucleus was a monopoly of the nuclear weapon by guaranteed only 5 countries, and a nucleus resisted the world as a thing I monopolized virtual world hegemony, and to immobilize without the other countries devoted themselves as non-nuclear, and recognizing possession and the experiment of the above-mentioned nucleus when I did it from participation non-nuclear because it was a purpose that it did not seem to scatter it.
I can wonder at this treaty, too. It developed in a global nuclear war if used by any chance, and the simulation in the case that I used even the past Korean War or the Cuban Missile crisis Vietnam War Gulf War for by all means even if I cannot but hesitate about the use as the weapon which I cannot use by the kana that was the real question or the war may have been connected by the done reason for destruction of the destruction of the earth.
If I retort if spoken ill, and I am hit, the person is going to hit it back. The which the quarrel escalates more if either is clearly weak and raises a flag of surrender and does not apologize and uses the stick next and hits you, and was hit wants to come to do a knife this time when the errand weapon lets I use the handgun, and a partner surrender to the escalation last more and goes. If a country and a country or a sphere of influence where the political interest is opposed begins war once, I use the nuclear weapon last and will think about victory.
As for the thing of a sense of victimization, I hate another person from background consciousness with the defense of one's defense own country and unavoidable circumstances each other so that it may be said by all means and hate other countries, and the war with a quarrel and a country and the country of a person and the person begins a quarrel and war.
Unfortunately, as for the human, the solution of the dispute by the violence does not yet disappear in this way in the many parts of the world while unfortunately aiming at the solution by the communication conversation. I think that I may not completely understand a course of the solution by the conversation as far as the human is the human.
It revises Article 9 of the constitution for peace recently, and a thought of the self-defense nucleus possession gains power in Japan. It seems that there is not the room that anyone doubts as for the importance of the defense capacity each Southeast Asia country which did Korean Peninsura China even if there were each unavoidable circumstances when the first is invaded by Japan, and Vietnam be available if クエート is occupied in U.S.A. by Iraq, and Iraq watches that it was occupied U.S.A. by the beginning and the multinational force which did it, and to protect an own country.
It is difficult whether a nuclear armament with the nuclear weapon serves as an own country and will protect it yet. When clearly political negotiations think about the present conditions to become advantageous disadvantage whether they hold a nuclear weapon, I withdraw from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) from now on still more, and I am owned, and a running country will come out with the development of the nuclear weapon.
The possession of nuclear weapons country which assumes U.S.A. the beginning does a nuclear weapon all at once when I completely became extinct to 0. Are you possible? A current possession country cannot do that a possession of nuclear weapons country holds world hegemony all at once, and North Korea India Pakistan seems to certainly cause such a situation by oneself.
It is Hiroshima, and it was Nagasaki that the human really used a nuclear weapon, but will what was not used more than it be because the human is smart, and there was self-control so far? But I was lucky. Because the world may not be exposed to a crisis to become extinct again when in future if based on まで just before use having gone many times